Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2022·No. 22-2484·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2484 ___________________________

Kenneth Daywitt; Kenneth Parks; Nicholas Luhmann; Joseph Thomas; Ramone Newell; Allen Pyron

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Jodi Harpstead, in their official and individual capacities; Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; Kathryn Schesso, in their official and individual capacities; Peter Puffer, in their official and individual capacities

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: November 14, 2022 Filed: November 17, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota civil detainees Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann, Joseph Thomas, Ramone Newell, and Allen Pyron appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their pro se complaint for failure to state a claim. After careful de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead, (8th Cir. 2022).

Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead (Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related