Kenneth D. Robinson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

• Court: Indiana Court of Appeals
• Decided: November 20, 2015
• Docket: 02A03-1505-CR-286
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 20 2015, 8:44 am

regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Anthony S. Churchward Gregory F. Zoeller Deputy Public Defender Attorney General of Indiana Fort Wayne, Indiana Ian McLean Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Kenneth D. Robinson, November 20, 2015 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 02A03-1505-CR-286 v. Appeal from the Allen Superior Court State of Indiana, The Honorable Frances C. Gull, Appellee-Plaintiff Judge. Trial Court Cause No. 02D05-1412-F5-161

Baker, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1505-CR-286 | November 20, 2015 Page 1 of 5 [1] Kenneth Robinson appeals the sentence he received for Level 5 Felony Battery.1

He asks us to revise his sentence. Finding his sentence not inappropriate, we

affirm.

Facts [2] On December 23, 2014, Robinson got angry with his girlfriend, Saundra

Taylor. He struck her face with a closed fist, knocking her to the ground. He

then knelt on her chest, immobilizing her, and struck her jaw approximately ten

more times.

[3] When police officers found her, Taylor was bleeding heavily from her mouth.

She was crying and appeared to be in agony. She was taken to the hospital

where doctors found multiple fractures of her jaw, in addition to a fractured

tooth. Successful treatment required oral surgery and wiring her jaw shut.

[4] On December 31, 2014, the State charged Robinson with Level 5 felony battery

and Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.2 He pleaded guilty to both charges

on March 13, 2015.

[5] On April 10, 2015, the trial court held a sentencing hearing. At that hearing,

the trial court heard evidence regarding Robinson’s criminal history. He has

thirty-three prior misdemeanor convictions and seven prior felony convictions.

His convictions include two driving while intoxicated convictions, six criminal

1 Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1. 2 I.C. 35-42-2-1.3.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1505-CR-286 | November 20, 2015 Page 2 of 5 conversion convictions, three resisting law enforcement convictions, two

operating with a suspended license convictions, and a criminal trespass

conviction—and all of these were before 2000, only halfway through his thirty-

year criminal history.

[6] The trial court found Robinson’s extensive criminal background and failed

efforts at rehabilitation to be aggravating factors. It found his acceptance of

responsibility and remorse to be mitigating factors. The trial court entered

judgment on the felony battery charge, vacated the conviction of domestic

battery on double jeopardy grounds, and sentenced Robinson to six years

imprisonment. Robinson now appeals his sentence.

Discussion and Decision [7] Robinson has one argument on appeal; he posits his willingness to plea guilty in

a timely manner, without the benefit of a plea agreement, “to be a substantial

mitigating circumstance which should have balanced the aggravating

circumstances found by the trial court. . . .” Appellant’s Br. 9. However, we no

longer review the balancing of aggravators and mitigators. See Angelmeyer v.

State, 868 N.E.2d 482, 491 (Ind. 2007). Robinson is correct that his willingness

to plead guilty, his acceptance of responsibility, and his remorse deserve some

weight. Precisely how much weight these factors deserve, however, is to be

decided by the trial court, not by us.

[8] Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) provides the following: “The Court may revise a

sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial court’s

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1505-CR-286 | November 20, 2015 Page 3 of 5 decision, the Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature

of the offense and the character of the offender.” The principal role of such

review is to attempt to leaven the outliers, but not to achieve a perceived

“correct” sentence. Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008).

Sentencing is principally a discretionary function in which the trial court’s

judgment should receive considerable deference. Id. at 1222. “Such deference

should prevail unless overcome by compelling evidence portraying in a positive

light the nature of the offense (such as accompanied by restraint, regard, and

lack of brutality) and the defendant’s character (such as substantial virtuous

traits or persistent examples of good character).” Stephenson v. State, 29 N.E.3d

111, 122 (Ind. 2015).

[9] The sentence prescribed for a Level 5 felony is “imprison[ment] for a fixed term

of between one (1) and six (6) years, with the advisory sentence being three (3)

years.” Ind. Code § 35-50-2-6(b). The trial court sentenced Robinson to a

maximum term of six years.

[10] Turning to our Rule 7(B) review, as to the nature of the offense, Robinson

committed a brutal act of battery. This was not a single swing; rather,

Robinson knocked his victim to the floor, knelt on her chest, and struck her ten

more times. She had multiple jaw fractures, experienced severe pain, and had

to have her jaw wired shut. Thus, the nature of Robinson’s offense gives us no

reason to reduce his sentence.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1505-CR-286 | November 20, 2015 Page 4 of 5 [11] Neither does his character. Robinson has been convicted of thirty-three

misdemeanors and seven felonies. His convictions are spread evenly through a

thirty-year criminal career. This battery was no aberration. In sum, we do not

find the six-year sentence imposed by the trial court to be inappropriate in light

of the nature of Robinson’s offense and his character.

[12] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Bailey, J., and Mathias, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1505-CR-286 | November 20, 2015 Page 5 of 5