Kenneth D. Kirkendoll v. Robert Matthews, Warden, Federal Correctional Facility, Lexington, Kentucky

802 F.2d 458
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 1986
Docket18-1471
StatusUnpublished

This text of 802 F.2d 458 (Kenneth D. Kirkendoll v. Robert Matthews, Warden, Federal Correctional Facility, Lexington, Kentucky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth D. Kirkendoll v. Robert Matthews, Warden, Federal Correctional Facility, Lexington, Kentucky, 802 F.2d 458 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

802 F.2d 458

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
KENNETH D. KIRKENDOLL, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
ROBERT MATTHEWS, WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-5063.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1986.

BEFORE: KRUPANSKY, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The petitioner moves for counsel and the respondent moves to dismiss this appeal from the district court's order denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was convicted of probation violation and received a five year sentence. That sentence was later reduced to two years.

The petition alleges that the prison officials failed to give the petitioner proper credit for time spent in a county jail. As relief, he requested his immediate release. The district court found that the petitioner's arguments were without merit.

The respondent's motion to dismiss is accompanied by an affidavit showing that the petitioner has been released from prison and has received his absolute release from custody. Under these circumstances, the petitioner's claim for release is now moot. LoCicero v. Day, 518 F.2d 783, 785 (6th Cir. 1975).

The motion for counsel is denied. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 F.2d 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-d-kirkendoll-v-robert-matthews-warden-fede-ca6-1986.