Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2006·No. 129405·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129405 & (9) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan KENNETH CHARLES LESTER, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129405

AGC: 2991/04

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to strike is DENIED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 27, 2006 _________________________________________ s0221 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis, (Mich. 2006).

Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis (Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.