Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis
This text of Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis (Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129405 & (9) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan KENNETH CHARLES LESTER, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
v SC: 129405
AGC: 2991/04
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to strike is DENIED.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 27, 2006 _________________________________________ s0221 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Charles Lester v. Attorney Grievance Commis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-charles-lester-v-attorney-grievance-commis-mich-2006.