Kenneth Bernard Scott, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2008
Docket14-08-00168-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kenneth Bernard Scott, Jr. v. State (Kenneth Bernard Scott, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth Bernard Scott, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 13, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 13, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00168-CR

KENNETH BERNARD SCOTT, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 831609

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery, with an affirmative finding on the use of a deadly weapon, and sentenced to twenty years in prison on August 22, 2000.  No motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until October 2, 2000.  Accordingly, on December 7, 2000, this court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Scott v. State, No. 14-00-01264-CR (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.) (not designated for publication). 


On February 8, 2008, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in the same case.  This court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second untimely appeal from this conviction.  The exclusive post‑conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n. 8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  This court also lacks jurisdiction to consider a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.  An intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over post‑conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07(3)(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2007); Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294‑95 (Tex. App.CEastland 2003, no pet.).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 13, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Self v. State
122 S.W.3d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kenneth Bernard Scott, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-bernard-scott-jr-v-state-texapp-2008.