Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD.
This text of Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD. (Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-22-00369-CV ___________________________
KENNETH B. CHAIKEN AND PATRICIA HARVEY, Appellants
V.
CORVALLA, LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-5037-431
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
We have considered appellants’ “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Accordingly, Appellee’s “Opposed Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief” is
denied as moot.
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 1, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth B. Chaiken and Patricia Harvey v. Corvalla, LTD., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-b-chaiken-and-patricia-harvey-v-corvalla-ltd-texapp-2022.