Kenneth Allen Gerhard Lukasik v. State
This text of Kenneth Allen Gerhard Lukasik v. State (Kenneth Allen Gerhard Lukasik v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant is awaiting trial of an indictment accusing him of aggravated assault. Appellant, who represents himself, filed a motion to recuse the Honorable Charles R. Ramsay, Judge of the 22nd Judicial District Court. After a hearing before the Honorable James C. Onion, the motion was overruled. Appellant gave notice of appeal.
The order denying the motion to recuse may be reviewed on appeal following conviction. Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f); see Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (rule 18a applicable in criminal cases); see also Pelt v. State Bd. of Ins., 802 S.W.2d 822, 826 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ) (absent specific authority, this Court has no jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals). The appeal is dismissed.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and B. A. Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 10, 1996
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kenneth Allen Gerhard Lukasik v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-allen-gerhard-lukasik-v-state-texapp-1996.