Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Organization

884 F.2d 628, 280 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10122
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1989
Docket88-7234
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 884 F.2d 628 (Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Organization) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Organization, 884 F.2d 628, 280 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10122 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Opinion

884 F.2d 628

143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 280 U.S.App.D.C. 189

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Kenneth ABRAMS, et al., Appellants,
v.
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, An Unincorporated Labor
Organization.

No. 88-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 13, 1989.

Before MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders, filed October 25, 1988 and November 7, 1988, be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memoranda accompanying those orders.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United States
917 F. Supp. 841 (District of Columbia, 1996)
Abrams v. Communications Workers of America
818 F. Supp. 393 (District of Columbia, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 F.2d 628, 280 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2304, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-abrams-v-communications-workers-of-america-an-unincorporated-cadc-1989.