Kenneth A. Ruby and Lawrence Cowan v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
This text of 351 F.2d 309 (Kenneth A. Ruby and Lawrence Cowan v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The present plaintiffs had recovered default judgments against one Joseph Wolfe in an automobile collision negligence suit. Wolfe had been insured for liability but his insurance company, the defendant-appellee in this action, withdrew coverage because of Wolfe’s prejudicial lack of cooperation in the tort action. Those claims against Wolfe’s insurance company completely depended upon the validity of Wolfe’s coverage. The questions involved were properly submitted to the jury. We find no prejudicial trial error.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
351 F.2d 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-a-ruby-and-lawrence-cowan-v-lumbermens-mutual-casualty-company-ca3-1965.