Kenneth A. Jackson v. Shirley A. Rogers, Warden

103 F.3d 129, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35733, 1996 WL 683463
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 1996
Docket96-3254
StatusUnpublished

This text of 103 F.3d 129 (Kenneth A. Jackson v. Shirley A. Rogers, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth A. Jackson v. Shirley A. Rogers, Warden, 103 F.3d 129, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35733, 1996 WL 683463 (6th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

103 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Kenneth A. JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Shirley A. ROGERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-3254.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1996.

Before: KENNEDY and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; EDGAR, District Judge.*

ORDER

Kenneth A. Jackson, an Ohio state prisoner, appeals through counsel a district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

A jury convicted Jackson of two counts of theft, perjury, 38 counts of passing bad checks, and 76 counts of securities violations. After unsuccessfully pursuing a direct appeal in the state courts, Jackson filed this petition for federal habeas corpus relief, challenging a number of jury instructions, an evidentiary ruling, and the sufficiency of the indictments. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, who recommended that the petition be dismissed on the merits. The district court adopted this recommendation over Jackson's objections.

Upon review, we agree with the district court that neither the allegedly erroneous evidentiary ruling nor the jury instructions deprived Jackson of a fundamentally fair trial, see Clemmons v. Sowders, 34 F.3d 352, 356 (6th Cir.1994); Owens v. Foltz, 797 F.2d 294, 296 (6th Cir.1986), and that the indictments sufficiently apprised Jackson of the charges against him. Accordingly, the dismissal of this petition for habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

*

The Honorable R. Allan Edgar, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald Owens v. Dale Foltz
797 F.2d 294 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
Kenneth Clemmons v. Dewey Sowders, Warden
34 F.3d 352 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F.3d 129, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35733, 1996 WL 683463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-a-jackson-v-shirley-a-rogers-warden-ca6-1996.