Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 Cases)

61 F.3d 894
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 1995
Docket94-1540
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F.3d 894 (Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson v. United Parcel Service (2 Cases), 61 F.3d 894 (3d Cir. 1995).

Opinion

61 F.3d 894

Kenneth A. Hinds, Gregory W. Dickerson
v.
United Parcel Service (2 cases)

NOS. 94-1540, 94-1541

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 27, 1995

Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01245

AFFIRMED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F.3d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenneth-a-hinds-gregory-w-dickerson-v-united-parce-ca3-1995.