Kenner v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Kenner v. State

470 N.E.2d 1361, 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3050

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 19, 1984

DocketNo. 4-484 A 102

StatusPublished

This text of 470 N.E.2d 1361 (Kenner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenner v. State, 470 N.E.2d 1361, 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3050 (Ind. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Charles Kenner (Kenner) appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct in the Marion Municipal Court. While his appeal was pending, Ken-ner died. The executrix of Kenner's estate now petitions this court to process this appeal to a decision.

Appeal dismissed.

ISSUES

The sole issue presented by the request of the executrix is whether an appeal may be processed to its conclusion after the death of an appellant in a criminal case.

FACTS

Dr. Kenner drove his automobile past the scene of an accident one afternoon. While passing he appeared to speed up his automobile to merge left, then went around the accident scene. A police officer at the seene chased Dr. Kenner in a police car and stopped him. Following an exchange of words, Dr. Kenner was placed under arrest for disorderly conduct (unreasonable noise) [1362]*1362and unreasonable speed. At trial, a jury found him not guilty of unreasonable speed. but guilty of disorderly conduct. Dr. Ken-ner appealed, but while his appeal was pending he was struck by an automobile while riding his bicycle and was killed.

The executrix petitions this court to process Dr. Kenner's appeal to a decision because the matter involved an important principle to him, he never before had been involved in a criminal proceeding, and he felt his character and reputation were at issue.

DISCUSSION AND DECISION

With some regret, we must dis miss this appeal. Absent any question of general public interest, the issues involved in an appeal are rendered moot by the death of the appellant, and the appeal is abated. - Bodle v. Lofayette National Bank, (1964) 136 Ind.App. 547, 202 N.E.2d 184. Criminal proceedings are abated ab initio when a defendant dies while his appeal is pending. People v. Mazzone, et al., (1978) 74 Ill.2d 44, 23 Ill.Dec. 76, 383 N.E.2d 947; State v. Blake, (1977) 53 Ohio App.2d 101, 371 N.E.2d 843.

Our jurisdiction of this appeal died with Dr. Kenner. While the issues here presented were of great private concern to him, they do not present compelling questions the answers to which would effect the public generally.

MILLER, P.J., concurs. YOUNG, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Charles Kenner (Kenner) appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct in the Marion Municipal Court. While his appeal was pending, Ken-ner died. The executrix of Kenner's estate now petitions this court to process this appeal to a decision.

Appeal dismissed.

ISSUES

The sole issue presented by the request of the executrix is whether an appeal may be processed to its conclusion after the death of an appellant in a criminal case.

FACTS

Dr. Kenner drove his automobile past the scene of an accident one afternoon. While passing he appeared to speed up his automobile to merge left, then went around the accident scene. A police officer at the seene chased Dr. Kenner in a police car and stopped him. Following an exchange of words, Dr. Kenner was placed under arrest for disorderly conduct (unreasonable noise) [1362]*1362and unreasonable speed. At trial, a jury found him not guilty of unreasonable speed. but guilty of disorderly conduct. Dr. Ken-ner appealed, but while his appeal was pending he was struck by an automobile while riding his bicycle and was killed.

The executrix petitions this court to process Dr. Kenner's appeal to a decision because the matter involved an important principle to him, he never before had been involved in a criminal proceeding, and he felt his character and reputation were at issue.

DISCUSSION AND DECISION

With some regret, we must dis miss this appeal. Absent any question of general public interest, the issues involved in an appeal are rendered moot by the death of the appellant, and the appeal is abated. - Bodle v. Lofayette National Bank, (1964) 136 Ind.App. 547, 202 N.E.2d 184. Criminal proceedings are abated ab initio when a defendant dies while his appeal is pending. People v. Mazzone, et al., (1978) 74 Ill.2d 44, 23 Ill.Dec. 76, 383 N.E.2d 947; State v. Blake, (1977) 53 Ohio App.2d 101, 371 N.E.2d 843.

Our jurisdiction of this appeal died with Dr. Kenner. While the issues here presented were of great private concern to him, they do not present compelling questions the answers to which would effect the public generally.

MILLER, P.J., concurs. YOUNG, J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 N.E.2d 1361, 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenner-v-state-indctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack