Kenner v. Hord
This text of 1 Va. 204 (Kenner v. Hord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, in this case, had died after the filing of his answer ; and now Botts, for his representatives, moved that an order might be entered, that the injunction should stand dissolved as an act of this day, unless, the complainant, on or before the last day of the next term, should revive the suit against the representatives of Hord. He cited the order, in the case of Carter v. Washington, as in point.
A difference may, perhaps, be taken between the two cases : and the rules of the Court should be settled on very mature deliberation. At a subsequent day, the judge observed that the motion had been considered by the Court; that no distinction, in principle, could be discovered between this case and that of Carter v. Washington, and that the order might be entered as moved for.
N. B. An agreement at the bar prevented the entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Va. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenner-v-hord-vachanct-1806.