Kenner v. Connally

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kenner v. Connally

95 S.E. 308, 22 Ga. App. 94, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 15, 1918

Docket9212

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 308 (Kenner v. Connally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenner v. Connally, 95 S.E. 308, 22 Ga. App. 94, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. Under the provisions of sections 6054 and. 6071 of the Civil Code of 1910, the verdict directed in this case was demanded by the evidence adduced at the trial.

2. There is no merit in the various special grounds of the motion for a new trial, assigning error upon the rejection of certain'proffered testimony.

3. The judgment refusing the motion for a new trial is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages against the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI