Kennemore v. United States
This text of 84 F. App'x 479 (Kennemore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Pro se federal prisoner Kevin Lamont Kennemore appeals a district court order that dismissed his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Kennemore has filed a motion to supplement the record. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
It is undisputed that Kennemore remains incarcerated pursuant to his conviction for various drug offenses. Thus, he is barred from challenging this conviction through a petition for writ of error coram nobis. United States v. Johnson, 237 F.3d 751, 755 (6th Cir.2001).
Accordingly, the motion to supplement the record is denied, and the district court’s order is affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennemore-v-united-states-ca6-2003.