Kennedy Valve Manuf'g Co. v. Chapman Valve Manuf'g Co.
This text of 80 F. 527 (Kennedy Valve Manuf'g Co. v. Chapman Valve Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming that the device of the complainant below covers a patentable invention, which, however, we do not determine, we agree with the circuit court, for the reasons stated by it, that the patent is so narrow that the respondent below did not infringe it. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, and the costs of appeal are adjudged to the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 F. 527, 25 C.C.A. 612, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-valve-manufg-co-v-chapman-valve-manufg-co-ca1-1897.