Kennedy Valve Manuf'g Co. v. Chapman Valve Manuf'g Co.
80 F. 527, 25 C.C.A. 612, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2224
Opinion
Assuming that the device of the complainant below covers a patentable invention, which, however, we do not determine, we agree with the circuit court, for the reasons stated by it, that the patent is so narrow that the respondent below did not infringe it. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, and the costs of appeal are adjudged to the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kennedy Valve Manuf'g Co. v. Chapman Valve Manuf'g Co., 80 F. 527, 25 C.C.A. 612, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2224 (1st Cir. 1897).
80 F. 527 (Kennedy Valve Manuf'g Co. v. Chapman Valve Manuf'g Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.