Kennedy v. State

199 S.W.3d 830, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004, 2006 WL 1792229
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2006·No. No. WD 65218·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Kennedy appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. State, 199 S.W.3d 830, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004, 2006 WL 1792229 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

199 S.W.3d 830 (Kennedy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christopher Kennedy v. Mike Kemna
666 F.3d 472 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)