Kennedy v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Kennedy v. State

905 S.W.2d 70, 321 Ark. 564, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 518

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedSeptember 18, 1995

DocketCR 95-897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 905 S.W.2d 70 (Kennedy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. State, 905 S.W.2d 70, 321 Ark. 564, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 518 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Eric Kennedy, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, John Henry, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Eric Kennedy, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, John Henry, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

905 S.W.2d 70, 321 Ark. 564, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-state-ark-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack