Kennedy v. State

96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1923·No. 1 Div. 467.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The record contains a motion for new trial, a judgment overruling the motion, in which judgment it is noted that defendant excepts to the action of the court in overruling the motion, but there is no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, incorporating the motion for new trial, the action of the court in overruling the motion and exception thereto, this court cannot consider the Question. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. Justice, 204 Ala. 547, 86 South. 389; Powell v. Folmar, 201 Ala. 271, 78 South. 47; Crawley v. State, 16 Ala. App. 545, 79 South. 804.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. State, 96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

96 So. 724 (Kennedy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawley v. State
79 So. 804 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Powell v. Folmar
78 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Justice
86 So. 389 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)