Kennedy v. State
This text of 96 So. 724 (Kennedy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record contains a motion for new trial, a judgment overruling the motion, in which judgment it is noted that defendant excepts to the action of the court in overruling the motion, but there is no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, incorporating the motion for new trial, the action of the court in overruling the motion and exception thereto, this court cannot consider the Question. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. Justice, 204 Ala. 547, 86 South. 389; Powell v. Folmar, 201 Ala. 271, 78 South. 47; Crawley v. State, 16 Ala. App. 545, 79 South. 804.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-state-alactapp-1923.