Kennedy v. State

96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 29, 1923
Docket1 Div. 467.
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 724 (Kennedy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. State, 96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The record contains a motion for new trial, a judgment overruling the motion, in which judgment it is noted that defendant excepts to the action of the court in overruling the motion, but there is no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, incorporating the motion for new trial, the action of the court in overruling the motion and exception thereto, this court cannot consider the Question. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. Justice, 204 Ala. 547, 86 South. 389; Powell v. Folmar, 201 Ala. 271, 78 South. 47; Crawley v. State, 16 Ala. App. 545, 79 South. 804.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawley v. State
79 So. 804 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Powell v. Folmar
78 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Justice
86 So. 389 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 724, 19 Ala. App. 248, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-state-alactapp-1923.