Kennedy v. Saul
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00026-GCM-DCK DENNIS KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Upon remand, Defendant will consider any effects on the claim of current receipt of Supplemental Security Income, as well as provide Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing. SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 7, 2020 Lab Leah Graham C. Mullen ee United States District Judge mt
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kennedy v. Saul (Kennedy v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.