Kennedy v. Rumble

61 S.E. 839, 4 Ga. App. 415, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 318
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 18, 1908·No. 1047·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Where a case is submitted to the decision of the trial judge on the law and the facts, and the bill of exceptions sets out the evidence and the judgment, and assigns error as follows: “To which ruling and order the plaintiff excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error,” the assignment of error, according to repeated rulings of, the Supreme Court, is too general, and presents no question for consideration. The assignment should have stated whether the judgment complained of was contrary to law or contrary to evidence, or contrary to both. Civil Code, § 5584; Carter v. Jackson, 115 Ga. 679 (42 S. E. 46) ; Kimball v. Williams, 108 Ga. 812 (33 S. E. 994); Wheeler v. Worley, 110 Ga. 513 (35 S. E. 639) Collins v. Carr, 111 Ga. 867 (36 S. E. 959), and eases cited. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. Rumble, 61 S.E. 839, 4 Ga. App. 415, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 318 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

61 S.E. 839 (Kennedy v. Rumble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tilley v. King
9 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Anderson v. Ashford & Co.
160 S.E. 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Kennedy v. Manry
66 S.E. 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)