Kennedy v. Ridgefield City

Ninth Circuit

Kennedy v. Ridgefield City

423 F.3d 1117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2005

DocketNo. 03-35333

StatusPublished

This text of 423 F.3d 1117 (Kennedy v. Ridgefield City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. Ridgefield City, 423 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This order amends the opinion filed for this case on June 23, 2005. The last sentence of the second full paragraph on page 7478 of the slip opinion currently reads “The court granted summary judgment to the defendants on all state law claims and to Ridgefield City on Kennedy’s § 1983 ‘failure to train’ claim.” That sentence is now replaced with: “The court granted summary judgment to the defendants on plaintiffs’ state law claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and the tort of outrage and to Ridgefield City on Kennedy’s § 1983 ‘failure to train’ claim.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This order amends the opinion filed for this case on June 23, 2005. The last sentence of the second full paragraph on page 7478 of the slip opinion currently reads “The court granted summary judgment to the defendants on all state law claims and to Ridgefield City on Kennedy’s § 1983 ‘failure to train’ claim.” That sentence is now replaced with: “The court granted summary judgment to the defendants on plaintiffs’ state law claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and the tort of outrage and to Ridgefield City on Kennedy’s § 1983 ‘failure to train’ claim.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 F.3d 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-ridgefield-city-ca9-2005.