Kennedy v. Plant City

155 So. 2d 556
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1963
DocketNo. 3816
StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 2d 556 (Kennedy v. Plant City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. Plant City, 155 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals an order granting a new trial after he had secured a jury verdict in the court below. Upon trial, the jury awarded the appellant a verdict of $300 compensatory and $5000.00 punitive damages. The lower court awarded a new trial upon the grounds that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence and the punitive damages [557]*557award was so grossly excessive as to shock the judicial conscience.

We are of the opinion that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a new trial. See Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 264; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; and Hutchinson v. Lott, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 442.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., ALLEN, J., and OVERSTREET, MURRAY W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cloud v. Fallis
107 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Hutchinson v. Lott
110 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 2d 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-plant-city-fladistctapp-1963.