Kennedy v. Plant City

155 So. 2d 556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1963·No. No. 3816·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals an order granting a new trial after he had secured a jury verdict in the court below. Upon trial, the jury awarded the appellant a verdict of $300 compensatory and $5000.00 punitive damages. The lower court awarded a new trial upon the grounds that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence and the punitive damages [557] award was so grossly excessive as to shock the judicial conscience.

We are of the opinion that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a new trial. See Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 264; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; and Hutchinson v. Lott, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 442.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., ALLEN, J., and OVERSTREET, MURRAY W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. Plant City, 155 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

155 So. 2d 556 (Kennedy v. Plant City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloud v. Fallis
107 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Hutchinson v. Lott
110 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)