Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

Supreme Court

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

369 U.S. 832, 82 S. Ct. 863

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 372 U.S. 144 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 2, 1962·No. No. 19·Published

Opinion

[832]*832Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 365 U. S. 809.)

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.

Thomas R. Davis argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was John W. Willis. Jacob Wasserman, David Carliner, Rowland Watts, Stephen J. Poliak and Osmond K. Fraenkel filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[832]*832Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 365 U. S. 809.)

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.

Thomas R. Davis argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was John W. Willis. Jacob Wasserman, David Carliner, Rowland Watts, Stephen J. Poliak and Osmond K. Fraenkel filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellee.

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 369 U.S. 832, 82 S. Ct. 863 (1962).

Pincite

369 U.S. 832 (Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.