Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

Supreme Court

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

369 U.S. 832, 82 S. Ct. 863

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 2, 1962

DocketNo. 19

StatusPublished

This text of 369 U.S. 832 (Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 369 U.S. 832, 82 S. Ct. 863 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

[832]*832Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 365 U. S. 809.)

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.

Thomas R. Davis argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was John W. Willis. Jacob Wasserman, David Carliner, Rowland Watts, Stephen J. Poliak and Osmond K. Fraenkel filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[832]*832Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 365 U. S. 809.)

This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.

Thomas R. Davis argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was John W. Willis. Jacob Wasserman, David Carliner, Rowland Watts, Stephen J. Poliak and Osmond K. Fraenkel filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 U.S. 832, 82 S. Ct. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-mendoza-martinez-scotus-1962.