Kennedy v. Kingsbury
210 Cal. 667
This text of 210 Cal. 667 (Kennedy v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kennedy v. Kingsbury, 210 Cal. 667 (Cal. 1930).
Opinion
The questions presented in this case are identical with those presented in Kelley v. Kingsbury, (L. A. No. 12146), ante, p. 37 [290 Pac. 885], this day decided. Upon the authority of that ease the alternative writ is discharged, the prayer for a peremptory writ is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
Langdon, J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelley v. Kingsbury
290 P. 885 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
210 Cal. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-kingsbury-cal-1930.