Kennedy v. Holt

67 S.E. 379, 67 W. Va. 118, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 11
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 22, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 379 (Kennedy v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. Holt, 67 S.E. 379, 67 W. Va. 118, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 11 (W. Va. 1910).

Opinion

BRANNON, Judge:

An execution was issued by the clerk of the circuit court of Taylor county in favor of Lewis Ritter and Carrie Ritter against William Mallonee, Abraham W. Burdett, Estella Mallonee, James P. Maxwell and James Kennedy for twenty-five dollars and twenty-four cents costs in a certain chancery suit. Kennedy- and Burdett instituted a motion to quash said execution, and the court refused to quash it, and dismissed the motion, and awarded costs against Kennedy and Burdett, and then Kennedy and Burdett applied to this Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the circuit court and Ritters from proceeding to enforce the judgment for costs awarded upon said motion to quash said execution.

We will refuse the prohibition for the reason that it is well settled that a writ of prohibition is purely jurisdictional and will not lie to correct mere error of law, and thus usurp the functions of a writ of error or appeal. Johnston v. Hunter, 50 W. Va. 52. The circuit court plainly had jurisdiction to enter[119]*119tain tbe motion to quash the execution, and if it was wrong it is mere error of law, and prohibition' does not lie. If the amount were over one hundred dollars everybody would say that the only remedy would be writ of error. The fact that a writ of error does not lie. because the. amount of costs does not warrant it, does not give a writ of prohibition. Farnsworth v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 28 W. Va. 815.

Writ Befiised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Charlotton v. O'Brien
63 S.E.2d 512 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1951)
Cirtin v. Cirtin
161 N.E. 709 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1928)
Taylor v. Stevenson
97 S.E. 136 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1918)
State ex rel. Ringer v. Morris
96 S.E. 926 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 379, 67 W. Va. 118, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-holt-wva-1910.