Kennedy v. Hagans

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kennedy v. Hagans

64 S.E. 330, 132 Ga. 503, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 19, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 330 (Kennedy v. Hagans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. Hagans, 64 S.E. 330, 132 Ga. 503, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which selects several fragments of sentences from different parts of the charge of the court, which are incomplete and unintelligible as set out in such ground, is not sufficiently definite to present any question for determination by this court. Holland v. Williams, 126 Ga. 617 (55 S. E. 1023).

2. The evidence which was introduced without objection was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Jtistices coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which selects several fragments of sentences from different parts of the charge of the court, which are incomplete and unintelligible as set out in such ground, is not sufficiently definite to present any question for determination by this court. Holland v. Williams, 126 Ga. 617 (55 S. E. 1023).

2. The evidence which was introduced without objection was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Jtistices coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 330, 132 Ga. 503, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-hagans-ga-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack