Kennedy v. Hagans

64 S.E. 330, 132 Ga. 503, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 19, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial which selects several fragments of sentences from different parts of the charge of the court, which are incomplete and unintelligible as set out in such ground, is not sufficiently definite to present any question for determination by this court. Holland v. Williams, 126 Ga. 617 (55 S. E. 1023).

2. The evidence which was introduced without objection was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Jtistices coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. Hagans, 64 S.E. 330, 132 Ga. 503, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1909).

64 S.E. 330 (Kennedy v. Hagans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
75 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)