Kennedy v. Fury
1 U.S. 72, 1 L. Ed. 42, 1 Dall. 72, 1783 U.S. LEXIS 8
Opinion
But by
the demise by B. is well enough. We have no Court of Equity here; and, therefore, unless the cestui que trust could bring an ejectment in his own name, he would be without remedy, in the case of an obstinate trustee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kennedy v. Fury, 1 U.S. 72, 1 L. Ed. 42, 1 Dall. 72, 1783 U.S. LEXIS 8 (1783).
1 U.S. 72 (Kennedy v. Fury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tritt v. Crotzer
13 Pa. 451 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850)
Bixler v. Kunkle
17 Serg. & Rawle 298 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1828)
Pipher v. Lodge
16 Serg. & Rawle 214 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1827)
Lessee of Simpson v. Ammons
1 Binn. 175 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1806)
Lessee of Frazer v. Hallowell
1 Binn. 126 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1805)
Lessee of Crunkelton v. Evert
3 Yeates 570 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1803)