Kennedy v. Fury
This text of 1 U.S. 72 (Kennedy v. Fury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[71]*71But by
(McKean, C. J., being absent), the demise by B. is well enough. We have no court of equity here; and, therefore, unless the cestui que trust could bring an ejectment in his own name, he would be without remedy, in the case of an obstinate trustee,
This case is frequently referred to as establishing what is now a well-settled principle. See Crunkelton v. Evert, 3 Yeates 570; Simpson v. Ammons, 1 Binn. 177.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 U.S. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-fury-pa-1783.