Kennedy v. Dzengielewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kennedy v. Dzengielewski

225 A.D. 845

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 845 (Kennedy v. Dzengielewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. Dzengielewski, 225 A.D. 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show that the appellant agreed to bind her separate estate to pay the plaintiff for services rendered by him to the appellant's husband, on the authority of Vernaglia v. Cirota (156 N. Y. Supp. 432); Potts v. Pardee (220 N. Y. 431, 434); McGuire v. Hughes (207 id. 516). Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show that the appellant agreed to bind her separate estate to pay the plaintiff for services rendered by him to the appellant's husband, on the authority of Vernaglia v. Cirota (156 N. Y. Supp. 432); Potts v. Pardee (220 N. Y. 431, 434); McGuire v. Hughes (207 id. 516). Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-dzengielewski-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack