Kennedy v. Dzengielewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kennedy v. Dzengielewski

225 A.D. 845

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show that the appellant agreed to bind her separate estate to pay the plaintiff for services rendered by him to the appellant's husband, on the authority of Vernaglia v. Cirota (156 N. Y. Supp. 432); Potts v. Pardee (220 N. Y. 431, 434); McGuire v. Hughes (207 id. 516). Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show that the appellant agreed to bind her separate estate to pay the plaintiff for services rendered by him to the appellant's husband, on the authority of Vernaglia v. Cirota (156 N. Y. Supp. 432); Potts v. Pardee (220 N. Y. 431, 434); McGuire v. Hughes (207 id. 516). Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Kennedy v. Dzengielewski, 225 A.D. 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

225 A.D. 845 (Kennedy v. Dzengielewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related