Kennedy v. Doll
This text of Kennedy v. Doll (Kennedy v. Doll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RUSHANNE D. KENNEDY, : CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-2141 : Petitioner : (Chief Judge Conner) : v. : : CLAIR DOLL, WARDEN, : : Respondent :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2019, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1), wherein petitioner, Rushanne Kennedy, challenges the constitutionality of his prolonged detention by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), and upon further consideration of respondent’s suggestion of mootness indicating that petitioner was removed from the United States on July 25, 2019, (see Doc. 7), and is no longer in ICE custody, which renders the petition moot, see Khodara Envtl., Inc. ex rel. Eagle Envtl., L.P. v. Beckman, 237 F.3d 186, 192-93 (3d Cir. 2001) (“Article III of the Constitution grants the federal courts the power to adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies.”); Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as moot.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kennedy v. Doll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-doll-pamd-2019.