Kennedy v. De Los Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kennedy v. De Los Reyes

26 A.D.2d 815, 274 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3200

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 815 (Kennedy v. De Los Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. De Los Reyes, 26 A.D.2d 815, 274 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered in the Family Court on December 16, 1965, directing respondent-appellant to make support payments of $60 per week and to post a cash bond in the sum of $9,360, or serve six months in the Workhouse to secure future payments, unanimously [816]*816reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, New York County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The record is devoid of proof of the child’s requirements. “ There should be proof by the petitioner, in the first instance of the child’s requirements”. (Matter of Silvestris v. Silvestris, 24 A D 2d 247, 250; see, also, Matter of Tosi v. Tosi, 24 A D 2d 974.) In the meantime payments of $60 per week shall continue, pursuant to section 434 of the Family Court Act, and we shall also continue the requirement of an undertaking of $9,360 to abide by such temporary order of support. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Capozzoli and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered in the Family Court on December 16, 1965, directing respondent-appellant to make support payments of $60 per week and to post a cash bond in the sum of $9,360, or serve six months in the Workhouse to secure future payments, unanimously [816]*816reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, New York County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The record is devoid of proof of the child’s requirements. “ There should be proof by the petitioner, in the first instance of the child’s requirements”. (Matter of Silvestris v. Silvestris, 24 A D 2d 247, 250; see, also, Matter of Tosi v. Tosi, 24 A D 2d 974.) In the meantime payments of $60 per week shall continue, pursuant to section 434 of the Family Court Act, and we shall also continue the requirement of an undertaking of $9,360 to abide by such temporary order of support. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Capozzoli and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 815, 274 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-de-los-reyes-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack