Kennedy v. David Kaufman & Sons Co.
This text of 92 A. 1086 (Kennedy v. David Kaufman & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the judgment entered pursuant to the foregoing memorandum the plaintiff appeals. The only question presented to the court below was one of statutory construction, and in our opinion the statute was rightly construed by Mr. Justice Bergen with reference to the facts pleaded, and the judgment of the court below will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by him in his memorandum.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogekt, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A. 1086, 86 N.J.L. 685, 1 Gummere 685, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-david-kaufman-sons-co-nj-1914.