Kennedy v. Commissioner

1965 T.C. Memo. 228, 24 T.C.M. 1155, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedAugust 24, 1965
DocketDocket No. 5323-63.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1965 T.C. Memo. 228 (Kennedy v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. Commissioner, 1965 T.C. Memo. 228, 24 T.C.M. 1155, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102 (tax 1965).

Opinion

Mildred Kennedy v. Commissioner.
Kennedy v. Commissioner
Docket No. 5323-63.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-228; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 1155; T.C.M. (RIA) 65228;
August 24, 1965
*102 Mildred Kennedy, pro se, 100 W. 57th St., New York, N. Y. J. Q. Smith and Colin MacDonald, for the respondent.

FAY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FAY, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioner's income tax as follows:

Additions to Tax
TaxableSec. 294(d)(1)(A),
YearDeficiency1939 Code
1953$ 7,812.98$703.17
19547,473.42674.91
195511,315.49
19569,091.66

The only issue for decision 1 is whether sums received by petitioner from the estate of her deceased husband represent capital gain or ordinary income.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated, are so found, and the stipulation of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto, is incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioner is an individual with residence*103 in New York City. She is the surviving wife of Thomas J. Kennedy (hereinafter referred to as the decedent), who died on August 9, 1951. Petitioner filed her Federal income tax returns on the cash basis of accounting and on the basis of a calendar year. Her returns for the years in issue were filed with the district director of internal revenue, Upper Manhattan, New York, New York.

Decedent during his lifetime was sometimes a theatrical agent. He secured engagements for his clients in the theatrical and radio fields. As a hobby and pastime, the decedent would amuse himself by developing formats and writing scripts for radio and television programs. These were worked on during spare hours at home for fun and relaxation. Sometimes the petitioner would participate. More often than not, these projects were never completed. Prior to 1945, none of these projects were ever sold. This was not a regular trade or business of the decedent, and he had no regular customers for these projects. About 1940 decedent developed an idea for a radio program. He reduced this idea to writing in the form of a radio format or audition, and in 1944 he filed the audition as a dramatic composition under the*104 title "Break the Bank" with the Copyright Office of the United States of America, The Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. A. copyright for 28 years was issued on April 14, 1944, in the name of decedent.

In 1945 decedent's health began to fail, and he was unable to work as a theatrical agent. He then was employed as a manager of a U.S.O. show and began to make efforts to place the "Break the Bank" show in the radio medium. He entered into negotiations with Wolf Associates, Inc., New York, New York, (hereinafter referred to as Wolf) and on August 1, 1945, a letter agreement was entered into as follows:

Let this serve as an understanding between us:

It is agreed that Wolf Associates, Inc. shall have the exclusive right to offer the property called, "Break The Bank" which you claim to be your property for a period of ninety days from this date.

In the event of a sale, the profits shall be divided equally between us, after all the necessary expenses for the operation of the show are deducted.

It is further understood that we will try to improve the present format and script of this property along the lines that we have discussed.

If after the ninety day period, the original*105 property should revert to you and you decide you would like to make use of the improvements we have brought about, you shall have the right to such use, provided that we shall receive 5% of the selling price of your show.

Wolf found a radio sponsor and on October 1, 1945, decedent and Wolf entered into the following letter agreement:

For, and in consideration of, the payments hereinafter set forth and other valuable considerations, you hereby grant us all right, title, and interest in the title and idea which you have previously submitted to us called, "Break The Bank" and agree to hold us harmless from any and all claims in connection therewith.

We have informed you that we have worked out a playable and saleable show and that we are negotiating with a nationally known sponsor, and contemplate closing a deal with them for a radio show to start in the very near future. Such contract will contain the usual thirteen week renewal clauses and the payments to be made to you are subject thereto.

In the event we consummate a contract with a sponsor within sixty days, we agree to pay you $100.00 per broadcast for the first thirteen weeks of broadcasting; $150.00 per broadcast for the*106 next twenty-six weeks of broadcasting; $200.00 per week for the next twenty-six weeks of broadcasting, unless we shall receive a firm $500.00 increase from the sponsor at the end of thirty-nine weeks, in which event we agree to pay you $250.00 instead of $200.00.

Whenever we shall receive $3500.00 per week or more for the radio program, you shall receive a flat 10% of the gross sum instead of the above stipulated sums.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1965 T.C. Memo. 228, 24 T.C.M. 1155, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-commissioner-tax-1965.