Kennedy v. Collins

108 A. 48, 30 Del. 426, 7 Boyce 426, 1919 Del. LEXIS 48
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided May 5, 1919·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.:

You can’t go into that in this actioix If the defendant had any remedy at that time, it was in chancery. To show duress in this case you would be compelled to show that there was no consideration for the execution. We sustain the objection.

Mr. Hawkins:—We have no other defense.

Mr. Magee:—I ask the court to give the jury binding instructions to find a verdict for the plaintiff.

[428]*428Pennewill, C. J.:

Under the testimony, gentlemen of the jury, there is nothing for you to do but find a verdict for the plaintiff.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. Collins, 108 A. 48, 30 Del. 426, 7 Boyce 426, 1919 Del. LEXIS 48 (Del. Ct. App. 1919).

108 A. 48 (Kennedy v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Tom Livizos Real Estate, Inc.
210 A.2d 299 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1965)
Italo-Petroleum Corporation of America v. Hannigan
14 A.2d 401 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1940)
Citizens Bank v. Hall
177 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Reed v. Bjornson
253 N.W. 102 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Citizens National Bank v. Custis
138 A. 261 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1927)