Kennedy v. Central Railroad
This text of 236 A.D. 478 (Kennedy v. Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The acts of the police officer in taking plaintiffs to defendant’s station and holding them there under the circumstances set forth in the record permitted the jury to find that he was acting for defendant rather than for the State. Under the New Jersey statute,
The judgments and orders should be affirmed, with costs.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
In each case: Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
See N. J. Laws of 1922, chap. 153, p. 267; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. N. J. 1911-1924) 240, chap. 29, § 4.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 478, 260 N.Y.S. 839, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1932.