Kennedy v. Bruno
This text of 176 A.D. 931 (Kennedy v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that we think that the finding, which the verdict under the charge imports, that the stairs were not free and open to the plaintiff’s use, was against the weight of the evidence. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton and Mills, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., dissented; Carr, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-bruno-nyappdiv-1917.