Kennedy v. Aesthetech Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kennedy v. Aesthetech Corp.

556 So. 2d 747, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2391, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5823

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 25, 1988

DocketNos. 88-545, 88-605, 88-689, and 88-1072

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 747 (Kennedy v. Aesthetech Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kennedy v. Aesthetech Corp., 556 So. 2d 747, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2391, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5823 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of arguments by counsel, we deny appellant Kennedy’s motion for rehearing, dismiss all pending appeals brought by Kennedy, and reverse the order granting a new trial on damages. We remand for entry of a final judgment in accordance with the remittitur. Because we reverse the order granting a new trial, we dismiss the appeals filed by Aesthe-tech ¹ and North Shore² without prejudice to their appealing upon entry of the final judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of arguments by counsel, we deny appellant Kennedy’s motion for rehearing, dismiss all pending appeals brought by Kennedy, and reverse the order granting a new trial on damages. We remand for entry of a final judgment in accordance with the remittitur. Because we reverse the order granting a new trial, we dismiss the appeals filed by Aesthe-tech ¹ and North Shore² without prejudice to their appealing upon entry of the final judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 747, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2391, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-aesthetech-corp-fladistctapp-1988.