Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 2021
Docket01-20-00630-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle (Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle

Appellate case number: 01-20-00630-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-33435

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

Appellee has filed a motion to supplement the reporter’s record with a transcript from an August 12, 2020 hearing. Appellee also requests that this Court order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record. “If anything relevant is omitted from the reporter’s record . . . the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). After reviewing the record and appellant’s brief, we grant appellee’s motion in part. We order the official court reporter for the 280th District Court to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter’s record of the August 12, 2020 hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). The supplemental reporter’s record is due in this Court within 15 days of the date of this order. Regarding appellee’s request for this Court to order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record, we note that appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs in the trial court, and the record does not reflect that the trial court overruled appellant’s claim of indigence. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Accordingly, we deny appellee’s request to order appellant to pay the cost of preparing the supplemental reporter’s record. See Abrigo v. Ginez, 580 S.W.3d 416, 419 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, no pet.) (stating that “statement of inability to pay that is uncontested in the trial court is conclusive as a matter of law” and that it is “an abuse of discretion for any judge. . . to order costs in spite of an uncontested [statement of inability to pay costs]”). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 2, 2021____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kennedy Richardson v. Harlie Earle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-richardson-v-harlie-earle-texapp-2021.