Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division

715 P.2d 1129, 78 Or. App. 319, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2595
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 2, 1986
Docket85-T-21; A36288
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 P.2d 1129 (Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy, King & Zimmer v. Employment Division, 715 P.2d 1129, 78 Or. App. 319, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2595 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, a partnership of lawyers, seeks judicial review of the referee’s decision holding that it is not entitled to succeed to the experience rating of its predecessor partnership after one of the partners withdrew from the partnership. The Employment Division concedes that petitioner is the successor in interest and that the referee’s decision should be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph, Babener & Carpenter v. Employment Division
737 P.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
715 P.2d 1129, 78 Or. App. 319, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-king-zimmer-v-employment-division-orctapp-1986.