Kennedy & Co. v. Savannah Buggy Co.

97 S.E. 196, 22 Ga. App. 762, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 738
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 1, 1918·No. 9554·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Harwell, J.

In this case no final judgment is excepted to, the only error assigned in the bill of exceptions being upon the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the plea and answer of the defendant and the striking of this plea and answer. Moreover, it does not appear from the bill of exceptions or the record that any final judgment was ever rendered. The bill of exceptions therefore can not be maintained, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Woodall v. Harris, 22 Ga. App. 69 (95 S. E. 377), and cases therein cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy & Co. v. Savannah Buggy Co., 97 S.E. 196, 22 Ga. App. 762, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 738 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 196 (Kennedy & Co. v. Savannah Buggy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Sanders
122 S.E. 341 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)