Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters
34 Me. 369
This text of 34 Me. 369 (Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters, 34 Me. 369 (Me. 1852).
Opinion
In a suit by a corporation against a subscriber to its capital stock, to recover assessments made upon tbe shares subscribed for, it is not competent for the defendant to show, by parol evidence, that his subscription was upon a condition, not expressed in the writing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.
107 N.W. 629 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Ollesheimer v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.
44 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Me. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennebec-portland-rail-road-v-waters-me-1852.