Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters
34 Me. 369
Opinion
In a suit by a corporation against a subscriber to its capital stock, to recover assessments made upon tbe shares subscribed for, it is not competent for the defendant to show, by parol evidence, that his subscription was upon a condition, not expressed in the writing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters, 34 Me. 369 (Me. 1852).
34 Me. 369 (Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.
107 N.W. 629 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Ollesheimer v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.
44 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)