Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters

34 Me. 369
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1852·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a suit by a corporation against a subscriber to its capital stock, to recover assessments made upon tbe shares subscribed for, it is not competent for the defendant to show, by parol evidence, that his subscription was upon a condition, not expressed in the writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters, 34 Me. 369 (Me. 1852).

34 Me. 369 (Kennebec & Portland Rail Road v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.
107 N.W. 629 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Ollesheimer v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.
44 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)