Kennealy v. Roberts

105 Cal. App. 797
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 12, 1930
DocketCiv. No. 7037
StatusPublished

This text of 105 Cal. App. 797 (Kennealy v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennealy v. Roberts, 105 Cal. App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

HOUSER, J.

The appeal herein, which is from an order admitting to probate the will of Francis Nita Miner, deceased, is companion to that this day decided by this court under the same title as appears in this appeal (ante, p. 593 [288 Pac. 120]). In substance, the facts presented by the record in the respective appeals are identical one with the other. Relying upon the decision in the former appeal as an authority, it is ordered that the order from which the appeal herein is taken be and it is affirmed.

Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 3, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 7, 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Kennealy
288 P. 120 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Cal. App. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennealy-v-roberts-calctapp-1930.