Kenna v. Atlas Steamship Co.

19 Abb. N. Cas. 265
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Abb. N. Cas. 265 (Kenna v. Atlas Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenna v. Atlas Steamship Co., 19 Abb. N. Cas. 265 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

The evidence established to my satisfaction that the defendant had duly appeared when the ex parte order of June 8, 1887, was obtained from Mr. Justice Patterson. After a defendant has appeared, a plaintiff cannot discontinue his suit ex parte, without payment of costs.

The motion to vacate the order is granted, with costs.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Abb. N. Cas. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenna-v-atlas-steamship-co-nysupct-1887.