Kenn Thorpe v. Compass Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 6, 2016
Docket05-16-00178-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kenn Thorpe v. Compass Bank (Kenn Thorpe v. Compass Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenn Thorpe v. Compass Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 6, 2016.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00178-CV

KENN THORPE, Appellant V. COMPASS BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11916

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Stoddart, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Stoddart Appellant appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee. In a letter

dated April 6, 2016, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal because there does not

appear to be a final judgment. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the

jurisdictional issue and gave appellee an opportunity to respond.

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and certain

interlocutory orders as permitted by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191,

195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and claims. See id.

Appellee filed counterclaims seeking damages for various statutory violations, sanctions

for filing a frivolous lawsuit, and attorney’s fees. Appellee moved for summary judgment on

appellant’s claims against it. The trial court an order granting appellee’s motion for summary

judgment. That order did not dispose of the counterclaims. In his letter brief, appellant states that he agrees with our “assessment of the issue.” He

suggests that we “order Judge Smith to dispose of all matters at BAR and distribute the funds as I

initially requested.” This we will not do.

Because the judgment does not dispose of the counterclaims and is not otherwise an

appealable interlocutory order, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

160178F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

KENN THORPE, Appellant On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. No. 05-16-00178-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11916. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. COMPASS BANK, Appellee Justices Myers and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee COMPASS BANK recover its costs of this appeal from appellant KENN THORPE.

Judgment entered this 6th day of June, 2016.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kenn Thorpe v. Compass Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenn-thorpe-v-compass-bank-texapp-2016.