Kenmore v. Mutual Housing Ass'n of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kenmore v. Mutual Housing Ass'n of New York, Inc.

284 A.D.2d 430, 726 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6334

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 430 (Kenmore v. Mutual Housing Ass'n of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenmore v. Mutual Housing Ass'n of New York, Inc., 284 A.D.2d 430, 726 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 15, 2000, which denied the motion of Steven J. Popkin, attorney for the plaintiffs, for a hearing to determine the apportionment of legal fees.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or [431]*431disbursements, as the plaintiffs are not aggrieved by the order dated June 15, 2000 (see, CPLR 5511; Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944, 945).

We note that although Steven J. Popkin submitted a pro se brief, he did not appeal from the order dated June 15, 2000. Bracken, P. J., Friedmann, Florio, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 15, 2000, which denied the motion of Steven J. Popkin, attorney for the plaintiffs, for a hearing to determine the apportionment of legal fees.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or [431]*431disbursements, as the plaintiffs are not aggrieved by the order dated June 15, 2000 (see, CPLR 5511; Scopelliti v Town of New Castle, 92 NY2d 944, 945).

We note that although Steven J. Popkin submitted a pro se brief, he did not appeal from the order dated June 15, 2000. Bracken, P. J., Friedmann, Florio, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 430, 726 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenmore-v-mutual-housing-assn-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack