Kenmore-Tonawanda School District v. State

38 A.D.3d 203, 831 N.Y.S.2d 67
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the Court of Claims of the State of New York (Thomas H. Scuccimarra, J.), entered June 29, 2006, which denied the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Claimant brought the instant action against the State Insurance Fund, the insurer of a company against whom claimant had obtained a judgment, pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) and (b). However, the State Insurance Fund is exempt from the requirements of Insurance Law § 3420 (a) and (b) (Insurance Law § 1108). Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Andrias, Friedman, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenmore-Tonawanda School District v. State, 38 A.D.3d 203, 831 N.Y.S.2d 67 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 203 (Kenmore-Tonawanda School District v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TOWN OF AMHERST v. HILGER, ARTHUR
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Miraglia v. State Insurance Fund
32 Misc. 3d 471 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)