Kengne v. String

Fourth Circuit

Kengne v. String

330 F. App'x 52

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2009·No. No. 09-1393·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zacharie K. Kengne appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court that Kengne’s complaint and his other filings are difficult to distill and do not contain a claim under the constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zacharie K. Kengne appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court that Kengne’s complaint and his other filings are difficult to distill and do not contain a claim under the constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Kengne v. String, 330 F. App'x 52 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

330 F. App'x 52 (Kengne v. String) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.