Kengne v. String
This text of Kengne v. String (Kengne v. String) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1393
ZACHARIE K. KENGNE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SALLY STRING; ELIZABETH (Owner of Liz Hair Design),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-00712-AW)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zacharie K. Kengne, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Zacharie K. Kengne appeals a district court order
dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the
record and agree with the district court that Kengne’s complaint
and his other filings are difficult to distill and do not
contain a claim under the constitution, laws or treaties of the
United States. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kengne v. String, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kengne-v-string-ca4-2009.