Kenford Co. v. County of Erie

185 A.D.2d 658

This text of 185 A.D.2d 658 (Kenford Co. v. County of Erie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenford Co. v. County of Erie, 185 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: A motion must be addressed to a pending action, and Supreme Court was without jurisdiction to entertain a motion almost two years after final judgment was entered (see, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Great Bend Aggregates [appeal No. 2], 181 AD2d 998; Urso v Panish, 94 AD2d 701). The entry of the final judgment terminated the action and all claims arising out of the same transactions are barred by well-settled principles of res judicata (see, O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353; Davie v Dwyer, 155 AD2d 921; Matter of Doherty v Cuomo, 76 AD2d 14, 20). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Damages.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Boehm, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. City of Syracuse
429 N.E.2d 1158 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Doherty v. Cuomo
76 A.D.2d 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Urso v. Panish
94 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Davie v. Dwyer
155 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenford-co-v-county-of-erie-nyappdiv-1992.