Kenefick v. Rees

25 A.D.2d 616, 269 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4897

This text of 25 A.D.2d 616 (Kenefick v. Rees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenefick v. Rees, 25 A.D.2d 616, 269 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion granted to restore ease to the next Trial Term Calendar, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff moved promptly for restoration to the calendar under rule 14 of the Seventh Judicial District Rules and on the showing made on such motion the denial by the Calendar Justice of an order to restore was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Appeal from order of Steuben Special Term, denying plaintiff’s motion to restore case to Trial Calendar.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.2d 616, 269 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenefick-v-rees-nyappdiv-1966.